Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. Check out Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 Got it! I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. How's that for an endorsement? The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. p.s. F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. I am telling them - don't! Thanks to you I got a Rokinon 14mm f2.8 and a 24mm f 1.4 and am considering this lens at the moment, but wonder how it compares to the Canon 135 mm f/2. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. Manually focusing a lens for astrophotography is nothing new, but the manual aperture ring adjustments may feel a little strange at first. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. There's just nothing there. https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. In this configuration, the lens is still a very fast F3.4. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. I have found myself shooting wide open almost all the time. I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. Test Notes here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. The lens came in a handsome box, with core specifications and a lens construction diagram printed on the side. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. In 3 months I got loosy focus ring. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. The California Nebula. Several functions may not work. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. Don't know what the young man uses as his camera, and if he has tried to keep the noise under control, or even tried to focus on the eyes of the mallard, or the cat (their eyes are not truly in focus). Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. Preaching to the choir! [emailprotected]. The aperture range of this lens is F/2 to F/22, with 9 diaphragm blades (aperture blades) that work in harmony to set your f-stop. Best Canon Lens for Astrophotography [Top 8 Reviewed] The lens is not weather-sealed, so you definitely dont want to leave your camera and lens (and your tracking mount!) It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. Dear Trevor, if you compare images taken with this lens to those from a 105mm f1.8 ais or a cosina 125mm and you'll see what i mean. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. Lensrentals.com - Rent Lenses and Cameras from Canon, Nikon, Olympus The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. At a local amateur soccer game using the 135 f/2 the action was almost always too close, or too far away. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. The latter are designed for crop sensor cameras and the back of the lens sticks too far into the body of the camera and would hit the EOS-clip filter. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. When I got home and loaded the photo into Lightroom I was blown away by two things. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens for Canon EF Digital SLR Cameras (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. The 135L is half the weight of the 70-200 2.8IS. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. It's kinda curious how topsy turvy things have gotten since this article, just 4 years later, I think 135mm is possibly more niche than ever yet Samyang finally delivered an AF version of this concept at a lighter weight for E mount, but also at a higher price. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. I'll take photo of Orion as soon as possible. Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. The flat lens hood is great for taking flat frames after a night of astrophotography. But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. Super sharp from f2. This is a stunning lens, clearly one of the very best lenses that Canon produces, this is in the same world class as the 35 1.4, 85 1.2 L lenses. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. Great reach for street shots. But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. (Suggesting that diffraction limiting is only part of the story with lens softness at tiny apertures.). (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. Why would I want a 135/2.0 lens when I have a 135/1.8? The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. But ppl should know there is much better advice in the forums. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. The extremes are 2 and 22. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. You currently have javascript disabled. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. For DPReview, it's also an opportunity for a good old-fashioned camera fight. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. Really, just an amazing lens, easily worth the $800-900 it commands on the street. I bought my lens in mint condition for $350 from Japan, but I see that some retailers are asking significantly more. Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. (purchased for $900). Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. Your Baader filter passes 420-680nm and, in theory, a good APO should be able to focus that part of the spectrum with no chromatic aberration. As such, it applies most directly here to areas of an image that are out of focus. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . LENSES FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY: Samyang 135mm f2 REVIEW - YouTube AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. Used with a FF body the DOF can be unforgiving, but if you nail focus the results can be magnificent. Yes there's bokeh. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. Some noteworthy targets to try. image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. It is fantastic on my old 5d. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). Besides lack of IS, the only major issue I have with this lens is flare. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. Andysea, those are great images on your website. You can't really ask them to stand still while you move around. Yes, because it is not f/2. How to Find the Perfect Astrophotography Target with Stellarium 30-35% diameter reduction is usually necessary on "good" lenses. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. Bond, I expect you to buy! I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. One difference worth pointing out is for those who image using narrowband filters. Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Hi Trevor, 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare.
Julann Wright Biography, Matt Schuler Insane Pools Fired, Williamson County Tn School Board District Map, Jeep Events In Tennessee 2022, Charles Tillman Daughter Heart Transplant, Articles C